GEORGES SIMENON

Simenon wrote over four hundred novels. He was most well-known for his Inspector Maigret books of which there are 75 plus 28  short stories. So he was extraordinarily prolific. What does he have to tell us about writing?

You might think that such a prodigious gift might have come with a happy temperament but no.

“Writing is considered a profession and I don’t think it is a profession. I think that everyone who does not need to be a writer, who thinks he can do something else, ought to do something else. Writing is not a profession but a vocation of unhappiness. I don’t think an artist can ever be happy.”

Not a happy bunny then.

But what about how he did it? Six novels a year that is.

  • he started with names which he got from a telephone book and a map of the place where the book was to be set and something that was worrying him
  • it took him eleven days – eight days writing plus three days for revision
  • before he started he’d get his doctor to check his blood pressure
  • he would line up four dozen freshly sharpened pencils on his desk and put a Do Not Disturb sign stolen from The Plaza Hotel, New York on his study door
  • for each book he had a lucky shirt which had to be washed each day
  • he wrote a chapter a day
  • if he fell ill during the course of writing the novel he’d throw it away and never return to it
  • usually at the end of the book when his doctor checked his blood pressure it would be lower than at the beginning
  • when each book was finished he always had the impression that it had not succeeded and wanted to try again
  • he knew nothing about the events of the novel when he began. If he had it would have been of no interest to him

He always wrote by hand because

“I am an artisan; I need to work with my hands. I would like to carve my novel in a piece of wood. My characters – I would like to have them heavier, more three-dimensional. And I would like to make a man so that everyone looking at him would find his own problems in this man.” 

And finally when asked if he ever changed his writing in response to criticism of it.

“Never. I have a very, very strong will about my writing and will go my own way. For instance all the critics for twenty years have said the same thing: It is time for Simenon to give us a big novel, a novel with twenty or thirty characters.’ They do not understand. I will never write a big novel. My big novel is the mosaic of my small novels.”

When he died, world-wide sales stood at 500 million copies in 55 languages, written in a vocabulary of no more than 2000 words.

Rowan Atkinson is due to take on the role of Inspector Maigret in the next television version. Quite odd casting to my mind but maybe that’s because the bearish figure of Michael Gambon suited the role so well. It will be interesting to see what Atkinson makes of it.

Have you read much Simenon? What do you think of him?

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “GEORGES SIMENON

  1. ‘a vocation of unhappiness’, eh? He doesn’t sound the happiest, as you say, but on the other hand he is very clear in his process. I suppose, for me, being an artist, is about freedom, however fleeting, and I don’t sense that here.

    Like

    • It’s interesting how freedom comes into it. When I write it can feel obsessional and the nature of obsession seems to me to be the absence of freedom. The most freedom I probably experience is at the very beginning when anything can happen but as the book goes along I am more and more trapped by what I’ve set up so I’m less free the further I go into it. What a cheery thought!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Yep, Mr Bean seems a bizarre choice alright, though I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt until I see it. Let’s hope it’s not as disastrous as casting David Walliams in that recent adaptation of Agatha Christie’s Tommy and Tuppence stories.

    There’s an interesting yarn here http://www.trussel.com/maig/harris.htm about how Richard Harris played Maigret before Michael Gambon. I’d love to track down the one and only episode that he did, to see what it was like.

    Like

    • Thanks Mel. Excellent link – after reading the article I’d like to see it too because it sounds hilarious – in a bad way. I agree about David Walliams – he’s charmless and leaden on screen. I ended up watching it for the clothes. Call me shallow but that was all the series had going for it.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s